Tag Archives: rescuer.

A light beyond the Caretaker passage?

Caretaker Burnout and Compassion Fatigue

Emotional burnout and compassion fatigue are common pitfalls among those of us who assume major Caretaker roles. Exhaustion, irritability, emotional numbness, and various physical complaints are warning signals indicating the need for better self-care. However, we often do not feel we have that option, as we see our own needs overshadowed by the needs of those in our care. We may develop a sort of tunnel vision, locked into a miserable path with no way out. What we had undertaken as a labor of love has evolved into a duty out of obligation, at times breeding an attitude of resentment. While there may be no appealing solution to this dilemma, this article proposes some perspectives and strategies that may offer some relief. It is likely that many of these ideas have been suggested to us previously and found lacking. Still, it is worthwhile to revisit these suggestions, reexamining and challenging our reservations and resistances to them.

The Caretaker – Dependent Relationship

It is obvious that the Caretaker role does not function in a vacuum: we need others to adopt a Dependent role in order to practice our Caretaking activities. We may assume the primary Caretaker role, or we may be called upon to take an auxiliary or backup Caretaking position. Our Dependents may have either acute or chronic needs which they are unable to fulfill for themselves. Some, particularly those with significant limitations and disabilities, may need considerable taking care of or doing for, while for others, caring for or being with will often suffice. Even with these differences, there is enough common ground to justify covering these variations from the same basic perspective, as I am doing in this article.

The Positive Impact of Caretaking on Both Giver and Receiver

Under ordinary circumstances, the Caretaker role is not just manageable, but also fulfilling. This undertaking may be longstanding, such as raising a family, or short-term, such as comforting a friend going through a temporary crisis. This role cultivates our compassion for others, strengthening the bonds of our relationship in the process. We also feel good about ourselves for helping others, especially when they express gratitude for our support. The Caretaking is obviously helpful to the Dependents, as well, particularly when it meets needs that they cannot resolve on their own. For those recipients capable of developing their self-care skills, this Caretaking gives them the time and the social modeling to become more self-reliant: why else would childhood last over a dozen years, until children are ready and able to move out on their own? And for those incapable of developing their own independent coping skills, the Caretaking provides a valuable safety net. Such is the case with children with severe developmental disorders or elderly plagued by dementia. Regardless of the Dependents’ potential for developing self-care, the Caretaker’s sacrifice and compassion helps them feel loved and valued.

Key Factors Supporting the Relationship

We can see that the interaction between Caretakers and the Dependents they support can be mutually reinforcing and mutually beneficial – a pattern which psychologist Paul Wachtel defined as a virtuous circle. Several factors shape the degree to which this interaction forms a relationship (i.e., it being enduring and recurrent). This pattern tends to persist to the degree that the Dependents experience ongoing and/or recurrent wants and needs that they cannot or will not seek to fulfill on their own. Another factor involves the particular Caretaker’s willingness and ability to help, as well as the availability and appeal of other available support options. The quality of the interaction also plays a key role:  the attitudes and expectations expressed by both sides can be just as important as the tangible benefits of the support. The Caretaker’s success in satisfying the Dependent’s wants and needs plays an obvious role. Success will conclude the interaction for a given situation, yet will increase the likelihood for a repeat of the pattern when another need or want arises. The various factors affecting Caretaker—Dependent relationships are certainly more extensive and complex than described in this brief paragraph. Still, this summary suggests some strategies for addressing those times when the relationship is not serving the mutual benefit of both parties. The rest of this article will explore these factors in more depth.

When Demands for Caretaking Are Excessive

While Caretaking usually has benefits for both giver and receiver, Caretakers can get too much of a good thing. Circumstances beyond our control may intervene, with severe and enduring demands that wear us down. Caring for a parent or a spouse with dementia, or for a severely disabled child, for example, can pose a daunting challenge. Making matters worse, our care recipients may have little potential for growth and self-reliance, such that Caretaking is essentially a maintenance role, with no end in sight. In such situations, we may come to see ourselves as victims of circumstance, with no other option than total surrender to the Caretaker role.

Helping Ourselves so that We Can Help Others

It is when we are confronted with such challenges that we are most called upon to take care of ourselves – after all, we cannot be much help to others if we become overwhelmed and depleted. We can remind ourselves of the flight attendant’s instruction that in the event of loss of cabin air pressure, we should put our own oxygen masks on first, so that we can reliably assist our Dependents. We may need to do something as simple as reminding ourselves to breathe deeply when we feel the demands to help others sucking the air out of us. We have a word for when we take and release a deep breath automatically – it’s called sighing. And when we consciously take a series of deep breaths, it’s called meditation.

The Challenge of Looking Out for Ourselves

Such advice, to take care of ourselves first, sounds rather simple and straightforward – that is, until we try putting it into practice. Then, we brace ourselves for the challenge, holding our breaths and building tension. We are likely to meet resistance to our practicing self-care, at times from others who encourage our Caretaker role, yet most often and most intensely from ourselves.

Continue reading Caretaker Burnout and Compassion Fatigue

Vicious Cycle Roles on the Societal and Political Level

drama-triangle

Vicious cycle patterns play out not only in personal relationships, but also on the societal and political level. Below is a table identifying key characteristics of the Drama Triangle, a common vicious cycle. This pattern was first described by Steven Karpman and cited in the book, Games Alcoholics Play, by Claude Steiner. In this pattern, the participants assume three interacting roles that produce an impasse. (While common for participants to alternate between roles, they usually gravitate toward roles suiting their values and personality styles.) In applying this model to our Congress, we can better appreciate the dynamic process behind the polarization and gridlock.

DESCRIPTIVE LABELS Persecutor
Critic
Enforcer
Victim
Rebel
Free Spirit
Rescuer
Enabler
Caretaker


POLITICAL
COUNTERRPART
Law & Order
Conservative
LibertarianBleeding Heart
Liberal
PREVAILING
VALUES
Order, Security, ConformityFreedom, IndividualityThe Common Good, Compassion
FUNCTIONS
OF THE
ROLE
Maintaining the status quo, preserving order and security, reducing the sense of threatEnjoying life,
maximizing pleasure,
minimizing distress,
expressing oneself fully
Achieving a sense of worth through helping others who cannot help themselves
BASIC
IMPLICIT
ASSUMPTION
Rebels threaten the basic values of our society, and they must be dealt with through force and coercion.Enforcers are the enemy bent on oppression, and I am not strong or skillful enough to deal with them effectively.Victims are too weak or helpless to take care of their own problems and conflicts, and they need my help.
TYPICAL
ACTIVITIES
Blaming, judging, criticizing and punishing Rebels for crimes, mistakes, shortcomings, wrongdoingComplaining of harrassment and unfair treatment, avoiding the Enforcers, seeking immediate relief and rescue by Enablers, escaping and unmbing by getting highCriticizing Enforcers for insensitivity and harshness toward Victims, providing relief for Victims and addvocating for them, helping them escape the natural consequences of their actions

Vicious Cycle Patterns in Relationships 1.0

The following is an article that I wrote about twenty years ago, yet my message is much the same now, though I have elaborated on it and integrated it with other themes, particularly the explorations of relationships as organic systems, rather than in terms of simple cause-and-effect relationships.  The Beetle Bailey comic strip by Mort Walker that I cite is from October 6, 1991, and it continues to be a timeless pattern.

THE CRITIC – VICTIM/REBEL – RESCUER CYCLE

drama-triangle

Adapted from the Persecutor-Victim-Rescuer Cycle, by Stephen Karpman, from the book, Games Alcohols Play, by Claude Steiner (1971)

VICIOUS CYCLES IN RELATIONSHIPS

AND TIPS ON HOW TO STOP SPINNING YOUR WHEELS

By Bob Daniel, Ph.D.

Tidewater Psychotherapy Services

How often have you found yourself caught up in a struggle with a spouse, friend, or other significant person, and the harder you try to resolve the problem, the worse the situation becomes?  And despite realizing this, you are compelled to keep trying the same approach, only harder?  Chances are that your partner in this struggle is experiencing a similar frustration and compulsion, though from a quite different perspective.  These features define the basic vicious cycle pattern of interaction.

 An example will illustrate this phenomenon.  In a “Beetle Bailey” comic strip a while back, General Halftrack’s wife scornfully predicts that he will stop off to have several drinks before returning home after golf.  He becomes sullen and indignant at her insinuation of his lack of self-discipline.  So how does he cope with his distress?  That’s right – he finds solace at his favorite bar.  We can further assume that Mrs. Halftrack will continue to address her loneliness by nagging him even more for his drinking and absences.  Though each spouse has a legitimate need – the wife’s wish for companionship and the husband’s desire for respect and confidence in him – each is responding in a manner that practically negates those possibilities.

 ADDICTION AND CODEPENDENCY

This pattern is one of many profiled in the current literature on addictive and codependent behavior.  Whatever the outlet – alcohol, drugs, pornography, gambling, food, compulsive shopping, etc. – the addiction offers the addict an escape from the codependent’s demands and provides an impersonal mode of tension relief.  This in turn enables the codependent partner to deflect attention away from his or her own inner pain and to focus on the partner’s addictive behavior.  The codependent then typically engages in a campaign of complaining, pleading, bribing, blaming, demanding, threatening, and withholding in order to correct and control the partner’s behavior.  As we saw in the case of the Halftracks, this only serves to perpetuate the problem.

 CRITIC – VICTIM – RESCUER TRIANGLES

The addiction-codependency pattern is only one version of the vicious cycle.  Other cycles may involve a third person, with each participant assuming a specialized role.  Such is the case with the critic-victim-rescuer cycle.  In this pattern the critic blames and punishes the victim, typically for some inadequacy or weakness.  The victim feels hurt, rejected, and fearful. Rather than confront the critic, the victim seeks solace from the rescuer, who identifies with the victim’s pain and assumes a protective posture.  The rescuer implicitly condones the victim’s retreat by interceding with the critic for patience and understanding for the victim.  A frequent implication of this message is that the critic has been cruel and insensitive.  The critic feels rejected and alienated by the victim-rescuer alliance and expresses this by blaming the rescuer for coddling the victim and by again criticizing and punishing the victim at the next instance of weakness, thus starting the cycle over.  These interactions serve to accentuate the roles of the participants:  critic as punitive outcast, victim as helpless dependent, and rescuer as self-sacrificing martyr.  These amplified roles in turn strengthen the vicious cycle.

 FAMILY TRIANGLES

Families are perhaps the prevalent setting for this triangular cycle, and families with rigidly defined roles are often the most susceptible.  In our culture the father commonly serves as disciplinarian, while the mother often provides protection and support.  Rigid adherence to these roles tends to polarize the parents into extreme positions, thereby setting up a critic-victim-rescuer cycle.  In this case the father places harsh, unrealistic demands on the child and the mother protects the child from even the normal risks required to develop competence and independence.  Another version frequently occurs in alcoholic and chaotic families, wherein one parent victimizes the other.  In this case the child attempts to fulfill the rescuer role, sacrificing his or her childhood to assume responsibility prematurely.  In severe cases of either variation, escalation to abuse and violence is possible, and imminent risk would require the intervention of authorities for protection.  Furthermore, these patterns may persist well into the offspring’s adulthood, with these well-learned roles and interactions available to be played out in other settings – including the next generation’s family.

 THE PERSISTENCE OF VICIOUS CYCLES

 Given the futility of vicious cycles, we might wonder why people stay in these downward spirals.  A basic reason is that the roles and interactions are well-learned from our family backgrounds, and we are apprehensive about trying anything new and unfamiliar.  Besides the security of the familiar, there also seems to be an innate human tendency to rework frustrating situations until we get them right.  This urge even extends to the choice of one’s spouse.  It has been observed that the overly responsible children of alcoholics often end up marrying alcoholics or similarly addicted personalities, even when they consciously try not to.  Thus, the partners tend to be well-matched in their complementary roles, which further strengthens the grip of the vicious cycle.

 Attempts to give up dysfunctional roles often pose threats to the identity upon which our self-esteem is based. Identity involves who we are not, as well as who we are.  Persons living out deeply ingrained roles often view other choices as totally alien:  “That’s just not me.”  A critic will feel comfortable expressing anger but not hurt, which is taken as a sign of weakness.  A victim will show hurt and doubt but not anger, which is seen as bad.  A rescuer will show hurt and anger for others, yet view doing so for oneself as selfish.  These definitions of self narrow the participants’ options and further lock them into their vicious cycle roles.

 FINDING THE WAY OUT

Once you recognize that you are in a vicious cycle, how can you escape it?  Actually, recognition is a major step, since stepping back to gain perspective releases you from the tunnel vision that keeps you focused on your partner’s role in the struggle.  Reflection usually shows that there is no single culprit responsible for the mess, but that each person plays a part.  This tends to counter the good vs. evil thinking that often perpetuates the struggle:  participants may blame each other and ignore their own choices, or they may attempt to relieve the distress of guilt, inadequacy, or assigned blame through some addictive or otherwise self-destructive behavior.  Gaining the perspective it takes to get yourself into the picture enables you to see the overall problem and to explore new options to resolve it.  When both partners in a vicious cycle get an overview of their dilemma, it can lead to an exciting process of mutual discovery.

 Even if only one partner were wanting to work on breaking the cycle, simply declining to participate in the vicious cycle in the usual way can help.  If Mrs. Halftrack stops complaining, the general might start assuming responsibility for his drinking, since he can no longer blame it on her nagging.  Or if he could stop drinking to relieve his distress, she might begin attending to her own loneliness.  Note that these are only possibilities, not guarantees.  You can influence others, but you cannot control them.  The paradox of influence is that it works best when you give up the illusion of control.  Thus, the most effective way out of a vicious cycle is to work on changing yourself.  Even then, it might not be enough, especially if your partner is deeply committed to his or her role.  Then, getting out of the vicious cycle may mean getting out of the relationship.

 GETTING HELP

Breaking a vicious cycle can be a truly difficult process, and support and guidance can be critical to its success.  If you are prone to vicious cycles, then your self-image will tend to be narrowly defined by your assumed role, with significant aspects of the psyche relegated to the “not me.”  Just as you require a mirror to reflect your body image, you come to see your personal self reflected in the eyes of others.  Thus, friends outside your vicious cycle can help you discover the disowned aspects of yourself that can help free you from the cycle.  Yet they may also become involved in the vicious cycle themselves, often in the rescuer role.  This usually just reinforces the narrow view of yourself defined by the vicious cycle.  It thus is important to assess their advice and support, rather than simply accepting it on blind faith.  Support groups, such as those focused around addictions and codependency, can be quite beneficial, since the members tend to be at various stages of recovery and disengagement from vicious cycles.  Psychotherapy can also be quite helpful.  While their techniques will vary according to theoretical orientation, therapists have the conceptual tools to support disengagement from vicious cycles.  Furthermore, therapists have often undergone extensive training and self-exploration to avoid getting caught up in the vicious cycles themselves in providing therapy.

 THE REWARDS:  SELF-ESTEEM AND INTIMACY

Escaping the vicious cycles offers the opportunity to expand one’s identity and to establish emotional intimacy with one’s partner.  A victim who uses her previously disowned anger to challenge her critics can become self-confident and gain the respect of others.  A rescuer who learns to advocate for herself and put her needs first can find greater satisfaction in relationships and discover her intrinsic self-worth.  A critic who admits his pain and vulnerability often finds greater acceptance from others, which helps to release him from the pressure of his own self-imposed unrealistic expectations.  Additionally, the self-defeating roles themselves can be transformed in healthier modes of relating.  A harsh critic who softens his judgmentalism can serve as an instructive mentor, guide or coach.  A rescuer who refrains from taking on others’ problems can care for others, rather than take care of them.  A victim who assumes responsibility for dealing with his problems can learn from authority figures rather than avoiding them as critics or seeking refuge through them as rescuers.  Furthermore, his expression of feelings can serve the self-disclosure required for his partners’ empathy.  When partners alternate among these various roles, then mutual support and intimacy become possible.  While breaking out of vicious cycle roles is difficult, the rewards of healthy self-esteem and enhanced intimacy are well worth the effort.

Dr. Bob Daniel is a Licensed Clinical Psychologist in private practice with Tidewater Psychotherapy Services in Virginia.